Exploring and Addressing Reward Confusion in Offline Preference Learning
Xin Chen, Sam Toyer, Florian Shkurti

TL;DR
This paper investigates reward confusion in offline RLHF caused by spurious correlations, introduces a benchmark for this problem, and proposes a method leveraging preference transitivity to mitigate confusion.
Contribution
It presents a new benchmark for reward confusion in offline RLHF and a method using preference transitivity and active learning to reduce reward confusion.
Findings
The proposed method significantly reduces reward confusion.
Benchmark effectively evaluates reward confusion issues.
Preference transitivity improves reward model reliability.
Abstract
Spurious correlations in a reward model's training data can prevent Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) from identifying the desired goal and induce unwanted behaviors. This paper shows that offline RLHF is susceptible to reward confusion, especially in the presence of spurious correlations in offline data. We create a benchmark to study this problem and propose a method that can significantly reduce reward confusion by leveraging transitivity of preferences while building a global preference chain with active learning.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
