Origin of Mars's moons by disruptive partial capture of an asteroid
Jacob A. Kegerreis, Jack J. Lissauer, Vincent R. Eke, Thomas D., Sandnes, Richard C. Elphic

TL;DR
This paper proposes a novel scenario where Mars's moons originated from fragments of a tidally disrupted asteroid that was captured, offering an alternative to previous theories like direct capture or formation from a debris disk.
Contribution
It introduces a new model of moon formation through disruptive partial capture of an asteroid, supported by simulations showing feasible mass capture and orbital evolution.
Findings
A significant portion of an asteroid's mass can be captured and survive long enough to form moons.
More than 1% of the asteroid's mass can circularize in the moons' region.
This mechanism requires less mass than giant impact scenarios, increasing its plausibility.
Abstract
The origin of Mars's small moons, Phobos and Deimos, remains unknown. They are typically thought either to be captured asteroids or to have accreted from a debris disk produced by a giant impact. Here, we present an alternative scenario wherein fragments of a tidally disrupted asteroid are captured and evolve into a collisional proto-satellite disk. We simulate the initial disruption and the fragments' subsequent orbital evolution. We find that tens of percent of an unbound asteroid's mass can be captured and survive beyond collisional timescales, across a broad range of periapsis distances, speeds, masses, spins, and orientations in the Sun--Mars frame. Furthermore, more than one percent of the asteroid's mass could evolve to circularise in the moons' accretion region. This implies a lower mass requirement for the parent body than that for a giant impact, which could increase the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
