Temptation: Immediacy and certainty
J. Lucas Reddinger

TL;DR
This paper investigates how immediacy and certainty influence present bias, finding that certainty increases present bias, with implications for economic decisions and a new experimental method.
Contribution
It introduces a novel experimental design to measure present bias under certainty and immediacy, revealing that certainty amplifies present bias effects.
Findings
Greater present bias observed with certain outcomes
Implications for labor contracts and consumer pricing
Provides a new methodological approach for experiments
Abstract
Is an option especially tempting when it is both immediate and certain? I test the effect of risk on the present-bias factor given quasi-hyperbolic discounting. In my experiment workers allocate about thirty to fifty minutes of real-effort tasks between two weeks. I study dynamic consistency by comparing choices made two days in advance of the workday with choices made when work is imminent. My novel design permits estimation of present bias using a decision with a consequence that is both immediate and certain. I find greater present bias when the consequence is certain. This finding has implications for any economic decision involving a present-biased decision-maker, including labor contracting and consumer good pricing. I offer a methodological remedy for experimental economists.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Economic Policies and Impacts
