PREVis: Perceived Readability Evaluation for Visualizations
Anne-Flore Cabouat, Tingying He, Petra Isenberg, Tobias Isenberg

TL;DR
This paper introduces PREVis, a validated instrument for measuring perceived readability in data visualizations, aiding researchers and practitioners in evaluation and design processes.
Contribution
The paper presents the first validated, multi-dimensional instrument for subjective readability assessment in visualizations, filling a gap in visualization quality evaluation tools.
Findings
Developed an 11-item questionnaire covering four readability dimensions.
Validated the instrument through rigorous testing.
Provides guidelines for implementation and use.
Abstract
We developed and validated an instrument to measure the perceived readability in data visualization: PREVis. Researchers and practitioners can easily use this instrument as part of their evaluations to compare the perceived readability of different visual data representations. Our instrument can complement results from controlled experiments on user task performance or provide additional data during in-depth qualitative work such as design iterations when developing a new technique. Although readability is recognized as an essential quality of data visualizations, so far there has not been a unified definition of the construct in the context of visual representations. As a result, researchers often lack guidance for determining how to ask people to rate their perceived readability of a visualization. To address this issue, we engaged in a rigorous process to develop the first validated…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
