Understanding the Needs of Nonhuman Stakeholders in Design Process: An Overview of and Reflection on Methods
Berre Su Yanlic, Aykut Coskun

TL;DR
This paper reviews methods in More-Than-Human design, emphasizing the need for tools to better understand nonhuman stakeholders like plants and microbes, to promote sustainable and inclusive design practices.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review of existing methods in MTH design, highlighting gaps and proposing directions for developing tools to include nonhuman perspectives.
Findings
Focus on animals and objects over plants and microbes
Scarcity of synthesis methods for nonhuman perspectives
Need for tools representing nonhuman relationships in ecosystems
Abstract
Design practice traditionally focused on human concerns, either overseeing the various effects of climate issues on nonhuman stakeholders or considering them as resources to address these problems. The climate crisis's urgency demands a design shift towards sustainability and inclusivity. This shift was happening through an emerging theme in design, More-Than-Human (MTH), which expands the notion of the user to animals, things, nature, and microbes. Such an expansion creates a requirement for designers to consider nonhuman perspectives during the design process. This paper investigates the methods used in MTH Design studies to explore and synthesize the perspectives of nonhuman users. Reviewing 30 papers, it highlights a predominant focus on animals and things over plants and microbes in MTH studies, along with a scarcity of synthesis methods. It identifies the necessity of tools that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDesign Education and Practice
