Univalence and Ontic Structuralism
Lu Chen

TL;DR
This paper advocates for using Univalent Foundations to rigorously implement ontic structuralism, emphasizing the identity of isomorphic structures and addressing related philosophical issues.
Contribution
It introduces Univalent Foundations as a promising logical framework for ontic structuralism, highlighting its advantages over other approaches.
Findings
UF treats isomorphic structures as identical, aligning with structuralist principles
UF provides a rigorous basis for addressing the hole argument
Brief discussion on symmetries in the context of UF
Abstract
The persistent challenge of formulating ontic structuralism in a rigorous manner, which prioritizes structures over the entities they contain, calls for a transformation of traditional logical frameworks. I argue that Univalent Foundations (UF), which feature the axiom that all isomorphic structures are identical, offer such a foundation and are more attractive than other proposed structuralist frameworks. Furthermore, I delve into the significance in the case of the hole argument and, very briefly, the nature of symmetries.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhilosophy, Science, and History
