Performance Analysis of Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Variants
Mansukh Pamarath, Dweep Gogia

TL;DR
This paper compares the performance of different TCP variants like Reno, Tahoe, Vegas, and SACK using NS2 simulations to measure throughput, delay, and drop rate under various network conditions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive performance analysis of multiple TCP variants under different traffic and bandwidth scenarios using NS2.
Findings
TCP variants show different throughput and delay characteristics.
SACK improves packet loss handling.
Performance varies significantly with network conditions.
Abstract
There are various TCP variants such as Reno, Tahoe, Vegas, SACK and so on. These variants implement algorithms that handle congestion control. In our experiments we have used these variants to measure their performance such as throughput, delay (latency), and drop rate with respect to time and Constant Bit Rate (CBR) - no congestion control, specified bandwidth and sends packets at a specified rate. We have used the NS2 network simulator to perform all our experiments to analyze TCP performance.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control · Network Packet Processing and Optimization · IPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
