Neural topology optimization: the good, the bad, and the ugly

TL;DR

This paper analyzes neural topology optimization, revealing how neural networks influence the optimization landscape, highlighting potential benefits for non-convex problems and challenges in architecture selection.

Contribution

It provides critical insights into how neural network architectures affect the optimization landscape and discusses the potential and limitations of neural TO.

Findings

NNs can introduce non-convexities in convex landscapes

Neural TO shows promise for non-convex problems

Architecture choice significantly impacts optimization performance

Abstract

Neural networks (NNs) hold great promise for advancing inverse design via topology optimization (TO), yet misconceptions about their application persist. This article focuses on neural topology optimization (neural TO), which leverages NNs to reparameterize the decision space and reshape the optimization landscape. While the method is still in its infancy, our analysis tools reveal critical insights into the NNs' impact on the optimization process. We demonstrate that the choice of NN architecture significantly influences the objective landscape and the optimizer's path to an optimum. Notably, NNs introduce non-convexities even in otherwise convex landscapes, potentially delaying convergence in convex problems but enhancing exploration for non-convex problems. This analysis lays the groundwork for future advancements by highlighting: 1) the potential of neural TO for non-convex problems and dedicated GPU hardware (the "good"), 2) the limitations in smooth landscapes (the "bad"), and 3) the complex challenge of selecting optimal NN architectures and hyperparameters for superior performance (the "ugly").