The Impact of $\texttt{CLEAN}$ing on Strong Gravitational Lens Modelling
Jacob Maresca, Simon Dye

TL;DR
This study compares image-plane and uv-plane modelling of strong gravitational lenses in simulated ALMA data, showing uv-plane modelling generally yields more accurate results and exploring the effects of weighting schemes and data binning.
Contribution
It demonstrates that direct uv-plane modelling outperforms image-plane methods and analyzes how weighting and binning affect lens parameter inference.
Findings
Uv-plane modelling outperforms image-plane modelling.
Briggs weighting yields more accurate results than natural weighting.
Time-binning visibilities up to threefold does not significantly affect parameters.
Abstract
We present a comparison of image and uv-plane galaxy-galaxy strong lensing modelling results for simulated ALMA observations with different antenna configurations and on-source integration times. Image-plane modelling is carried out via use of the algorithm, and we explore the effects of different visibility weighting schemes on the inferred lens model parameters. We find that direct modelling of the visibility data consistently outperforms image-plane modelling for both the naturally and Briggs-weighted images. We also find that the modelling of images created with Briggs weighting generally produces more accurate results than those obtained by modelling images constructed with natural weighting. We explain this by quantifying the suppression of information due to ing on scales at which the modelling is sensitive, and how this differs between Briggs and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeophysics and Gravity Measurements · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Computational Physics and Python Applications
