Some variants of remote sublocales
Mbekezeli Nxumalo

TL;DR
This paper explores variants of remote sublocales in locale theory, establishing their relationships with Booleanization and introducing new localic maps that preserve these remote sublocales.
Contribution
It introduces and analyzes variants of remote sublocales, their connection to Booleanization, and defines new localic maps called f-remote preserving maps.
Findings
The coframe of sublocales equals all sublocales remote from Booleanization.
The supplement of Booleanization is the largest sublocale *remote from Booleanization.
Conditions are given for localic maps to preserve remote sublocales.
Abstract
We introduce and study some variants of remote sublocales, namely sublocales that are remote from dense sublocales and those that are *remote from dense sublocales. We show that the coframe of sublocales coincides with the collection of all sublocales remote from the Booleanization. Furthermore, the supplement of the Booleanization of any locale is the largest sublocale *remote from the Booleanization. We give conditions on localic maps such that their induced localic image and pre-image functions preserve sublocales that are remote (resp. *remote) from dense sublocales. We introduce new types of localic maps called f-remote preserving maps.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLinguistics and Cultural Studies
