Smart polymer solution and thermal conductivity: How important is an exact polymer conformation?
Mokter M. Chowdhury, Robinson Cortes-Huerto, and Debashish Mukherji

TL;DR
This study investigates how the thermal conductivity switching in smart polymers depends more on solvent interactions than on precise polymer conformations, using generic simulations of collapse mechanisms.
Contribution
It demonstrates that solvent-monomer interactions are more critical than exact polymer conformation in thermal switching behavior, challenging the assumption that conformation alone governs thermal conductivity changes.
Findings
Collapse via temperature correlates with thermal switching.
Collapse via cosolvent mole fraction shows no correlation with thermal switching.
Solvent-monomer interactions are more influential than conformation in thermal conductivity changes.
Abstract
Heat management in devices is a key to their efficiency and longevity. Here, thermal switches (TS) are of great importance because of their ability to transition between different thermal conductivity states. While traditional TS are bulky and slow, recent experiments have suggested "smart" responsive (bio--inspired) polymers as their fast alternatives. One example is poly(N--isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) in water, where drops suddenly around a temperature K when a PNIPAM undergoes a coil--to--globule transition. At a first glance, this may suggest that the change in polymer conformation has a direct influence on TS. However, it may be presumptuous to trivially "only" link conformations with TS, especially because many complex microscopic details control macroscopic conformational transition. Motivated by this, we study TS in "smart" polymers…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
