
TL;DR
This paper conceptualizes decolonial AI as disenclosure, aiming to dismantle political, ecological, and epistemic borders in AI development rooted in colonialism, and advocates for inclusive, sustainable, and decolonized AI practices.
Contribution
It introduces a novel decolonial framework based on Achille Mbembe's disenclosure concept to critique and transform AI development and deployment.
Findings
Decolonial AI requires abolishing borders in political, ecological, and epistemic domains.
Decolonial AI can empower marginalized voices and knowledge from the global South.
Disenclosure offers a new perspective for intervening in colonial patterns of AI development.
Abstract
The development and deployment of machine learning and AI engender 'AI colonialism', a term that conceptually overlaps with 'data colonialism', as a form of injustice. AI colonialism is in need of decolonization for three reasons. Politically, because it enforces digital capitalism's hegemony. Ecologically, as it negatively impacts the environment and intensifies the extraction of natural resources and consumption of energy. Epistemically, since the social systems within which AI is embedded reinforce Western universalism by imposing Western colonial values on the global South when these manifest in the digital realm is a form of digital capitalism. These reasons require a new conceptualization of AI decolonization. First this paper draws from the historical debates on the concepts of colonialism and decolonization. Secondly it retrieves Achille Mbembe's notion of decolonization as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
