Efficient and accurate force replay in cosmological-baryonic simulations

TL;DR

This paper presents a method to efficiently reconstruct and interpolate the gravitational potential in cosmological simulations, enabling accurate orbit integration and analysis of galaxy dynamics over billions of years.

Contribution

The authors develop a basis function expansion technique for modeling time-evolving gravitational potentials with high fidelity, improving orbit reconstruction in cosmological simulations.

Findings

Reconstructed forces match simulation data with 95% accuracy outside subhalos.

Orbits are recovered with positional errors ≤10% over 2-3 periods.

Energy and angular momentum are conserved within 10% for a significant fraction of orbits after 4 Gyr.

Abstract

We construct time-evolving gravitational potential models for a Milky Way-mass galaxy from the FIRE-2 suite of cosmological-baryonic simulations using basis function expansions. These models capture the angular variation with spherical harmonics for the halo and azimuthal harmonics for the disk, and the radial or meridional plane variation with splines. We fit low-order expansions (4 angular/harmonic terms) to the galaxy's potential for each snapshot, spaced roughly 25 Myr apart, over the last 4 Gyr of its evolution, then extract the forces at discrete times and interpolate them between adjacent snapshots for forward orbit integration. Our method reconstructs the forces felt by simulation particles with high fidelity, with 95% of both stars and dark matter, outside of self-gravitating subhalos, exhibiting errors $\leq$4% in both the disk and the halo. Imposing symmetry on the model systematically increases these errors, particularly for disk particles, which show greater sensitivity to imposed symmetries. The majority of orbits recovered using the models exhibit positional errors $\leq$10% for 2-3 orbital periods, with higher errors for orbits that spend more time near the galactic center. Approximate integrals of motion are retrieved with high accuracy even with a larger potential sampling interval of 200 Myr. After 4 Gyr of integration, 43% and 70% of orbits have total energy and angular momentum errors within 10%, respectively. Consequently, there is higher reliability in orbital shape parameters such as pericenters and apocenters, with errors $\sim$10% even after multiple orbital periods. These techniques have diverse applications, including studying satellite disruption in cosmological contexts.