Simplify, Consolidate, Intervene: Facilitating Institutional Support with Mental Models of Learning Management System Use
Taha Hassan, Bob Edmison, Daron Williams, Larry Cox II, Matthew, Louvet, Bart Knijnenburg, D. Scott McCrickard

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new measurement model called depth-of-use (DOU) to evaluate faculty's LMS utilization and institutional support needs, based on large-scale data analysis at Virginia Tech.
Contribution
It proposes the DOU model for assessing LMS use, linking it to course attributes and institutional support strategies, addressing limitations of prior qualitative models.
Findings
LMS adoption driven by scale, interoperability, and access needs
DOU helps identify opportunity costs of transitioning to LMS tools
Supports evaluation of institutional support and faculty development efforts
Abstract
Measuring instructors' adoption of learning management system (LMS) tools is a critical first step in evaluating the efficacy of online teaching and learning at scale. Existing models for LMS adoption are often qualitative, learner-centered, and difficult to leverage towards institutional support. We propose depth-of-use (DOU): an intuitive measurement model for faculty's utilization of a university-wide LMS and their needs for institutional support. We hypothesis-test the relationship between DOU and course attributes like modality, participation, logistics, and outcomes. In a large-scale analysis of metadata from 30000+ courses offered at Virginia Tech over two years, we find that a pervasive need for scale, interoperability and ubiquitous access drives LMS adoption by university instructors. We then demonstrate how DOU can help faculty members identify the opportunity-cost of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEducational and Psychological Assessments · Online and Blended Learning · Online Learning and Analytics
