Delicate Analysis of Interacting Proteins and Their Assemblies by Flow Field-Flow Fractionation Techniques
Aur\'elien Urbes (L2C), Marie-H\'el\`ene Morel (UMR IATE), Laurence, Ramos (L2C), Fr\'ed\'eric Violleau (CAI), Am\'elie Banc (L2C)

TL;DR
This paper evaluates different AF4 techniques to analyze wheat gluten proteins, revealing how buffer choice and device configuration affect protein aggregation and separation of complex assemblies.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative analysis of AF4 methods with different eluents and devices for studying wheat gluten protein assemblies.
Findings
Frit-inlet device improves fractionation of wheat proteins in SDS buffer.
Water/ethanol eluent effectively separates gluten proteins and their assemblies.
Conventional AF4 with SDS buffer can induce aggregation during focus steps.
Abstract
We study the efficiency of several Asymmetrical Flow Field-Flow Fractionation (AF4) techniques to investigate the self-associating wheat gluten proteins. We compare the use of a denaturing buffer including sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and a mild chaotropic solvent, water/ethanol, as eluent, on a model gluten sample. Through a thorough analysis of the data obtained from coupled light scattering detectors, and with the identification of molecular composition of the eluted protein, we evidence co-elution events in several conditions. We show that the focus step used in conventional AF4 with the SDS buffer leads to the formation of aggregates that co-elute with monomeric proteins. By contrast, a frit-inlet device enables the fractionation of individual wheat proteins in the SDS buffer. Interestingly conventional AF4, using water/ethanol as eluent, is an effective method for fractionating…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
