Defining 'Good': Evaluation Framework for Synthetic Smart Meter Data
Sheng Chai, Gus Chadney, Charlot Avery, Phil Grunewald, Pascal Van, Hentenryck, Priya L. Donti

TL;DR
This paper proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework for synthetic smart meter data, emphasizing fidelity, utility, and privacy, and introduces new privacy testing methods to better assess privacy risks.
Contribution
It adapts evaluation frameworks from other industries to smart meter data and introduces novel privacy attack methods using implausible outliers.
Findings
Standard privacy attacks are inadequate for smart meter data
Explicit privacy testing with outliers reveals privacy risks
Choosing privacy parameters like epsilon impacts data utility and privacy balance
Abstract
Access to granular demand data is essential for the net zero transition; it allows for accurate profiling and active demand management as our reliance on variable renewable generation increases. However, public release of this data is often impossible due to privacy concerns. Good quality synthetic data can circumnavigate this issue. Despite significant research on generating synthetic smart meter data, there is still insufficient work on creating a consistent evaluation framework. In this paper, we investigate how common frameworks used by other industries leveraging synthetic data, can be applied to synthetic smart meter data, such as fidelity, utility and privacy. We also recommend specific metrics to ensure that defining aspects of smart meter data are preserved and test the extent to which privacy can be protected using differential privacy. We show that standard privacy attack…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSmart Grid Energy Management
