Age and metal gradients in massive quiescent galaxies at $0.6 \lesssim z \lesssim 1.0$: implications for quenching and assembly histories
Chloe M. Cheng, Mariska Kriek, Aliza G. Beverage, Arjen van der Wel,, Rachel Bezanson, Francesco D'Eugenio, Marijn Franx, Pavel E. Mancera Pi\~na,, Angelos Nersesian, Martje Slob, Katherine A. Suess, Pieter G. van Dokkum,, Po-Feng Wu, Anna Gallazzi, and Stefano Zibetti

TL;DR
This study analyzes spatially resolved stellar population gradients in massive quiescent galaxies at redshifts 0.6 to 1.0, revealing insights into their formation and assembly histories through age, metallicity, and abundance ratio profiles.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed measurements of stellar population gradients in quiescent galaxies at this redshift range using full-spectrum models, highlighting the evolution of these gradients over time.
Findings
Younger galaxies show negative [Fe/H] and positive age gradients, indicating recent central starbursts.
Older galaxies exhibit flatter age gradients and weaker, but still negative, metallicity gradients.
Gradients suggest a combination of merger activity and inherited star-forming phase characteristics.
Abstract
We present spatially resolved, simple stellar population equivalent ages, stellar metallicities, and abundance ratios for 456 massive () quiescent galaxies at from the Large Early Galaxy Astrophysics Census, derived using full-spectrum models. Typically, we find flat age and [Mg/Fe] gradients, and negative [Fe/H] gradients, implying iron-rich cores. We also estimate intrinsic [Fe/H] gradients via forward modelling. We examine the observed gradients in three age bins. Younger quiescent galaxies typically have negative [Fe/H] gradients and positive age gradients, possibly indicating a recent central starburst. Additionally, this finding suggests that photometrically measured flat colour gradients in young quiescent galaxies are the result of the positive age and negative metallicity gradients…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
