Rethinking OWL Expressivity: Semantic Units for FAIR and Cognitively Interoperable Knowledge Graphs Why OWLs don't have to understand everything they say
Lars Vogt

TL;DR
This paper introduces a modular framework for semantic knowledge graphs that enhances expressivity, interoperability, and cognitive accessibility by using semantic units and new representational resources, addressing OWL limitations.
Contribution
It proposes a novel semantic modularization approach with new resource types, enabling integration across logical frameworks and addressing core OWL modeling limitations.
Findings
Addresses twelve core OWL/RDF limitations
Enables reasoning across different logical frameworks
Improves cognitive accessibility for domain experts
Abstract
Semantic knowledge graphs are foundational to implementing the FAIR Principles, yet RDF/OWL representations often lack the semantic flexibility and cognitive interoperability required in scientific domains. We present a novel framework for semantic modularization based on semantic units (i.e., modular, semantically coherent subgraphs enhancing expressivity, reusability, and interpretability), combined with four new representational resource types (some-instance, most-instances, every-instance, all-instances) for modelling assertional, contingent, prototypical, and universal statements. The framework enables the integration of knowledge modelled using different logical frameworks (e.g., OWL, First-Order Logic, or none), provided each semantic unit is internally consistent and annotated with its logic base. This allows, for example, querying all OWL 2.0-compliant units for reasoning…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies
