Physics Based & Machine Learning Methods For Uncertainty Estimation In Turbulence Modeling
Minghan Chu

TL;DR
This paper reviews recent methods for uncertainty quantification in turbulence modeling, emphasizing machine learning approaches, their limitations, and future challenges in CFD simulations for engineering applications.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review of uncertainty quantification techniques in turbulence modeling, highlighting the integration of machine learning and identifying key limitations and future research directions.
Findings
ML methods can quantify turbulence model uncertainties
Limitations include realizability constraints and computational costs
Identifies key challenges for advancing UQ in CFD
Abstract
Turbulent flows play an important role in many scientific and technological design problems. Both Sub-Grid Scale (SGS) models in Large Eddy Simulations (LES) and Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) based modeling will require turbulence models for computational research of turbulent flows in the future. Turbulence model-based simulations suffer from a multitude of causes of forecast uncertainty. For example, the simplifications and assumptions employed to make these turbulence models computationally tractable and economical lead to predictive uncertainty. For safety-critical engineering design applications, we need reliable estimates of this uncertainty. This article focuses on Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) for Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. We review recent advances in the estimate of many types of uncertainty components, including numerical, aleatoric, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFault Detection and Control Systems · Energy Load and Power Forecasting
