What Appears Appealing May Not be Significant! -- A Clinical Perspective of Diffusion Models
Vanshali Sharma

TL;DR
This paper explores methods to evaluate the clinical significance of synthetic polyp images generated by diffusion models, aiming to connect visual quality with clinical relevance in medical imaging.
Contribution
It introduces strategies for assessing clinical significance of synthetic medical images and investigates the correlation between qualitative appearance and clinical importance.
Findings
Proposed evaluation strategies for clinical relevance
Identified challenges in linking visual quality to clinical significance
Explored potential correlations between qualitative and clinical assessments
Abstract
Various trending image generative techniques, such as diffusion models, have enabled visually appealing outcomes with just text-based descriptions. Unlike general images, where assessing the quality and alignment with text descriptions is trivial, establishing such a relation in a clinical setting proves challenging. This work investigates various strategies to evaluate the clinical significance of synthetic polyp images of different pathologies. We further explore if a relation could be established between qualitative results and their clinical relevance.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Cell Image Analysis Techniques
MethodsDiffusion
