Ab initio study of Z(N) = 6 magicity
H. Li, H. J. Ong, D. Fang, I. A. Mazur, I. J. Shin, A. M. Shirokov, J., P. Vary, P. Yin, X. Zhao, and W. Zuo

TL;DR
This study uses ab initio calculations to investigate the magicity of Z(N)=6 in nuclei, finding no support for it as a magic number except in specific isotopes like 14C and 14O, which show double-magic features.
Contribution
The paper provides the first ab initio analysis of Z(N)=6 magicity, challenging previous assumptions and identifying specific isotopes with double-magic characteristics.
Findings
Z(N)=6 is not supported as a magic number across atomic numbers
14C and 14O exhibit double-magic nucleus features
Ab initio calculations align with experimental observations
Abstract
The existence of magic numbers of protons and neutrons in nuclei is essential for understanding nuclear structure and fundamental nuclear forces. Over decades, researchers have conducted theoretical and experimental studies on the new magic number Z(N) = 6, focusing on observables such as radii, binding energy, electromagnetic transition, and nucleon separation energies. We perform the ab initio no-core shell model calculations for the occupation numbers of the lowest single particle states in the ground states of Z(N) = 6 and Z(N) = 8 isotopes (isotones). Our calculations do not support Z(N) = 6 as a magic number over a span of atomic numbers. However, 14C and 14O exhibit the characteristics of double-magic nuclei.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
