Cosmic topology. Part IIIa. Microwave background parity violation without parity-violating microphysics
Amirhossein Samandar, Javier Carr\'on Duque, Craig J. Copi, Mikel, Martin Barandiaran, Deyan P. Mihaylov, Thiago S. Pereira, Glenn D. Starkman,, Yashar Akrami, Stefano Anselmi, Fernando Cornet-Gomez, Johannes R. Eskilt,, Andrew H. Jaffe, Arthur Kosowsky

TL;DR
This paper explores how cosmic topology can naturally explain observed parity violations in the CMB, challenging the assumption of statistical isotropy without requiring new microphysical parity-violating physics.
Contribution
It demonstrates that cosmic topology can induce parity-violating correlations in the CMB, providing a novel framework to interpret anomalies without modifying microphysics.
Findings
Topology can generate $EB$ correlations from tensor perturbations.
Parity violations can arise from boundary conditions, not microphysics.
Topological effects challenge standard cosmological assumptions.
Abstract
The standard cosmological model, which assumes statistical isotropy and parity invariance, predicts the absence of correlations between even-parity and odd-parity observables of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Contrary to these predictions, large-angle CMB temperature anomalies generically involve correlations between even- and odd- angular power spectrum , while recent analyses of CMB polarization have revealed non-zero equal- correlations. These findings challenge the conventional understanding, suggesting deviations from statistical isotropy, violations of parity, or both. Cosmic topology, which involves changing only the boundary conditions of space relative to standard cosmology, offers a compelling framework to potentially account for such parity-violating observations. Topology inherently breaks statistical isotropy, and can also break…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
