Provable Privacy Advantages of Decentralized Federated Learning via Distributed Optimization

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that decentralized federated learning with distributed optimization offers significant privacy advantages over centralized models, supported by theoretical bounds and empirical case studies involving logistic regression and neural networks.

Contribution

It provides the first in-depth information-theoretical privacy analysis for decentralized FL, establishing bounds on privacy loss and contrasting it with centralized FL.

Findings

Decentralized FL bounds privacy loss by the same amount as centralized FL.

Complex models like neural networks show lower privacy risks in decentralized FL.

Theoretical analysis confirms privacy benefits through bounds on information leakage.

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) emerged as a paradigm designed to improve data privacy by enabling data to reside at its source, thus embedding privacy as a core consideration in FL architectures, whether centralized or decentralized. Contrasting with recent findings by Pasquini et al., which suggest that decentralized FL does not empirically offer any additional privacy or security benefits over centralized models, our study provides compelling evidence to the contrary. We demonstrate that decentralized FL, when deploying distributed optimization, provides enhanced privacy protection - both theoretically and empirically - compared to centralized approaches. The challenge of quantifying privacy loss through iterative processes has traditionally constrained the theoretical exploration of FL protocols. We overcome this by conducting a pioneering in-depth information-theoretical privacy analysis for both frameworks. Our analysis, considering both eavesdropping and passive adversary models, successfully establishes bounds on privacy leakage. We show information theoretically that the privacy loss in decentralized FL is upper bounded by the loss in centralized FL. Compared to the centralized case where local gradients of individual participants are directly revealed, a key distinction of optimization-based decentralized FL is that the relevant information includes differences of local gradients over successive iterations and the aggregated sum of different nodes' gradients over the network. This information complicates the adversary's attempt to infer private data. To bridge our theoretical insights with practical applications, we present detailed case studies involving logistic regression and deep neural networks. These examples demonstrate that while privacy leakage remains comparable in simpler models, complex models like deep neural networks exhibit lower privacy risks under decentralized FL.