On Equivalence of Parameterized Inapproximability of k-Median, k-Max-Coverage, and 2-CSP
Karthik C. S., Euiwoong Lee, and Pasin Manurangsi

TL;DR
This paper explores the deep connections between parameterized inapproximability hypotheses and classical problems like k-Median and k-Max-Coverage, establishing reductions that link their computational hardness.
Contribution
It presents a gap preserving FPT reduction from k-Max-Coverage to 2-CSP, and from k-Median to k-Max-Coverage, strengthening the understanding of their computational complexity.
Findings
Shows W[1]-hardness implications for k-Max-Coverage based on PIH.
Establishes a reverse reduction from k-Max-Coverage to 2-CSP.
Highlights the effectiveness of gap preserving FPT reductions.
Abstract
Parameterized Inapproximability Hypothesis (PIH) is a central question in the field of parameterized complexity. PIH asserts that given as input a 2-CSP on variables and alphabet size , it is W[1]-hard parameterized by to distinguish if the input is perfectly satisfiable or if every assignment to the input violates 1% of the constraints. An important implication of PIH is that it yields the tight parameterized inapproximability of the -maxcoverage problem. In the -maxcoverage problem, we are given as input a set system, a threshold , and a parameter and the goal is to determine if there exist sets in the input whose union is at least fraction of the entire universe. PIH is known to imply that it is W[1]-hard parameterized by to distinguish if there are input sets whose union is at least fraction of the universe or if the union of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
