"Best" iterative coupled-cluster triples model: More evidence for 3CC
Nakul Teke, Ajay Melekamburath, Bimal Gaudel, Edward F. Valeev

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the 3CC coupled-cluster method, demonstrating its superior accuracy over CCSDT and CCSD(T) for thermochemistry calculations, with a new implementation enabling broader applicability.
Contribution
The study provides a comprehensive assessment of the 3CC method's accuracy and introduces a new automated implementation for closed- and open-shell systems.
Findings
3CC yields more accurate energies than CCSDT and CCSD(T) with a double-zeta basis.
3CC significantly reduces errors in atomization energies compared to other methods.
The new implementation broadens the applicability of the 3CC method.
Abstract
To follow up on the unexpectedly-good performance of several coupled-cluster models with approximate inclusion of 3-body clusters [J. Chem. Phys. 151, 064102 (2019)] we performed a more complete assessment of the 3CC method [J. Chem. Phys. 125, 204105 (2006)] for accurate computational thermochemistry in the standard HEAT framework. New spin-integrated implementation of the 3CC method applicable to closed- and open-shell systems utilizes a new automated toolchain for derivation, optimization, and evaluation of operator algebra in many-body electronic structure. We found that with a double-zeta basis set the 3CC correlation energies and their atomization energy contributions are almost always more accurate (with respect to the CCSDTQ reference) than the CCSDT model as well as the standard CCSD(T) model. The mean absolute errors in cc-pVDZ {3CC, CCSDT, and CCSD(T)} electronic (per valence…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
