Non-convergence of Adam and other adaptive stochastic gradient descent optimization methods for non-vanishing learning rates

TL;DR

This paper proves that popular adaptive stochastic gradient descent methods like Adam do not converge when using non-vanishing learning rates, highlighting fundamental limitations in their theoretical guarantees.

Contribution

It provides a rigorous proof that Adam and similar adaptive optimizers fail to converge with fixed, non-zero learning rates, addressing a key open question.

Findings

Adam and similar methods do not converge with non-vanishing learning rates

Established pathwise bounds for a class of adaptive SGD methods

Highlights limitations of adaptive optimizers in certain training scenarios

Abstract

Deep learning algorithms - typically consisting of a class of deep neural networks trained by a stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization method - are nowadays the key ingredients in many artificial intelligence (AI) systems and have revolutionized our ways of working and living in modern societies. For example, SGD methods are used to train powerful large language models (LLMs) such as versions of ChatGPT and Gemini, SGD methods are employed to create successful generative AI based text-to-image creation models such as Midjourney, DALL-E, and Stable Diffusion, but SGD methods are also used to train DNNs to approximately solve scientific models such as partial differential equation (PDE) models from physics and biology and optimal control and stopping problems from engineering. It is known that the plain vanilla standard SGD method fails to converge even in the situation of several convex optimization problems if the learning rates are bounded away from zero. However, in many practical relevant training scenarios, often not the plain vanilla standard SGD method but instead adaptive SGD methods such as the RMSprop and the Adam optimizers, in which the learning rates are modified adaptively during the training process, are employed. This naturally rises the question whether such adaptive optimizers, in which the learning rates are modified adaptively during the training process, do converge in the situation of non-vanishing learning rates. In this work we answer this question negatively by proving that adaptive SGD methods such as the popular Adam optimizer fail to converge to any possible random limit point if the learning rates are asymptotically bounded away from zero. In our proof of this non-convergence result we establish suitable pathwise a priori bounds for a class of accelerated and adaptive SGD methods, which are also of independent interest.