A photo-z cautionary tale: Redshift confirmation of COSBO-7 at z=2.625
Shuowen Jin, Nikolaj B. Sillassen, Jacqueline Hodge, Georgios E., Magdis, Francesca Rizzo, Caitlin Casey, Anton M. Koekemoer, Francesco, Valentino, Vasily Kokorev, Benjamin Magnelli, Raphael Gobat, Steven Gillman,, Maximilien Franco, Andreas Faisst, Jeyhan Kartaltepe

TL;DR
This study confirms the spectroscopic redshift of COSBO-7 at z=2.625, demonstrating that photometric redshift estimates can be significantly inaccurate without comprehensive wavelength coverage, especially for dusty star-forming galaxies.
Contribution
The paper provides the first spectroscopic confirmation of COSBO-7's redshift, highlighting the pitfalls of relying solely on photometric redshifts for dusty galaxies.
Findings
Photometric redshift of COSBO-7 was initially overestimated at z>7.
Spectroscopic data confirmed COSBO-7 at z=2.625.
Mid-infrared data improves photometric redshift accuracy.
Abstract
Photometric redshifts are widely used in studies of dusty star-forming galaxies (DSFGs), but catastrophic photo- failure can undermine all redshift-dependent results. Here we report the spectroscopic redshift confirmation of COSBO-7, a strongly lensed DSFG in the COSMOS-PRIMER field. Recently, a photometric redshift solution of was reported for COSBO-7 based on ten bands of {\it James Webb} Space Telescope (JWST) NIRCam and MIRI imaging data. This value was favored by four independent spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting codes, and the result provided an appealing candidate for the most distant massive DSFG known to date. This photo- solution was also supported by a single line detection in Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) Band 3 consistent with CO(7-6) at . However, our new ALMA observations robustly detect two lines in Band 6 identified as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
