Beyond Benchmarking: A New Paradigm for Evaluation and Assessment of Large Language Models
Jin Liu, Qingquan Li, Wenlong Du

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new paradigm for evaluating large language models that emphasizes ongoing assessment and diagnosis over traditional benchmarking, aiming for more comprehensive and actionable insights.
Contribution
It proposes the Benchmarking-Evaluation-Assessment paradigm, shifting from static benchmarks to continuous, diagnostic evaluation with optimization guidance.
Findings
Deep attribution of LLM issues enables targeted improvements.
Evaluation content is based on specific task-solving rather than fixed benchmarks.
Provides a framework for ongoing assessment and optimization of LLMs.
Abstract
In current benchmarks for evaluating large language models (LLMs), there are issues such as evaluation content restriction, untimely updates, and lack of optimization guidance. In this paper, we propose a new paradigm for the measurement of LLMs: Benchmarking-Evaluation-Assessment. Our paradigm shifts the "location" of LLM evaluation from the "examination room" to the "hospital". Through conducting a "physical examination" on LLMs, it utilizes specific task-solving as the evaluation content, performs deep attribution of existing problems within LLMs, and provides recommendation for optimization.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Topic Modeling
