The mouth speaks as much as the eyes: Free-ranging dogs depend on inner facial features for human recognition

TL;DR

This study reveals that free-ranging dogs rely heavily on inner facial features like eyes, nose, and mouth for human recognition, adapting their responses based on individual identity and perceived intent in complex environments.

Contribution

It is the first comprehensive behavioral analysis demonstrating the importance of inner facial features for recognition in free-ranging dogs, highlighting differences from pet dogs and ecological adaptations.

Findings

Inner facial features are crucial for recognition.

Recognition depends on individual identity and intent.

Habitat and personality influence behavioral strategies.

Abstract

The human face is a multi-signal system continuously transmitting information of identity and emotion. In shared human-animal environments, the face becomes a reliable tool of heterospecific recognition. Because humans display mixed behaviour and pose differential risk to animals, adaptable decision-making based on recognition and classification of humans confer a fitness benefit. The human-dog dyad is an ideal model to study heterospecific recognition due to their shared history, niche overlap, and cognitive co-evolution. Multiple studies on pet dogs have examined their human facial information processing. However, no study has examined these perceptual abilities in free-living populations in their natural habitat where the human-dog relationship is more complex and impacts survival. Comprehensive behavioural analysis of 416 free-ranging dogs in an approach-based task with differential facial occlusion of a human, demonstrated that these dogs recognize and discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar people. Negative behaviours like aggression and avoidance were unlikely to be displayed. Inner facial components like eyes, nose and mouth were more important than outer components like hair in human recognition. Unlike in pet dogs, the occlusion of even a single inner component of the face prevented recognition by facial cue alone. Personality and habitat conditions influenced the behavioural strategy adopted by the dogs too. Considering the ambiguous nature of human interactions, recognition and response in free-ranging dogs relied on dual assessment of identity and intent of a human based, in part, on their ontogeny. Such a cue-processing system highlights the selection pressures inherent in the unpredictable environment of free-living populations.