Comparison of Models for the Warm-Hot Circumgalactic Medium around Milky Way-like Galaxies
Priyanka Singh, Erwin T. Lau, Yakov Faerman, Jonathan Stern, Daisuke, Nagai

TL;DR
This paper systematically compares four analytic models of the Milky Way-like circumgalactic medium, analyzing their thermodynamic profiles and observational predictions to understand their differences and implications.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of four CGM models, highlighting their differences in thermodynamic profiles and observational signatures for Milky Way-like galaxies.
Findings
Models differ most at small and large radii.
Entropy profile slopes vary between models.
Predictions for SZ, X-ray, and ion absorption differ across models.
Abstract
A systematic comparison of the models of the circumgalactic medium (CGM) and their observables is crucial to understanding the predictive power of the models and constraining physical processes that affect the thermodynamics of CGM. This paper compares four analytic CGM models: precipitation, isentropic, cooling flow, and baryon pasting models for the hot, volume-filling CGM phase, all assuming hydrostatic or quasi-hydrostatic equilibrium. We show that for fiducial parameters of the CGM of a Milky-Way (MW) like galaxy ( at ), the thermodynamic profiles -- entropy, density, temperature, and pressure -- show most significant differences between different models at small ( kpc) and large scales ( kpc) while converging at intermediate scales. The slope of the entropy profile, which is one of the most important…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena · Scientific Research and Discoveries · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
