Potential Based Diffusion Motion Planning
Yunhao Luo, Chen Sun, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Yilun Du

TL;DR
This paper introduces a neural network-based approach to potential-based motion planning that learns easily optimizable potentials, outperforming classical methods and avoiding local minima issues, while maintaining composability for various constraints.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel neural network method for learning potential functions in motion planning, enhancing optimization and generalization capabilities.
Findings
Significantly outperforms classical and learned motion planning methods.
Avoids local minima issues common in potential-based planning.
Demonstrates effective composability for different motion constraints.
Abstract
Effective motion planning in high dimensional spaces is a long-standing open problem in robotics. One class of traditional motion planning algorithms corresponds to potential-based motion planning. An advantage of potential based motion planning is composability -- different motion constraints can be easily combined by adding corresponding potentials. However, constructing motion paths from potentials requires solving a global optimization across configuration space potential landscape, which is often prone to local minima. We propose a new approach towards learning potential based motion planning, where we train a neural network to capture and learn an easily optimizable potentials over motion planning trajectories. We illustrate the effectiveness of such approach, significantly outperforming both classical and recent learned motion planning approaches and avoiding issues with local…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICML 2024 Poster
+ The idea of leveraging recent advance in diffusion models for potential based motion planning is interesting. + The paper is well written in general that clearly presents the basic idea and how the algorithm works. + Experiments on simulation and real-world dataset are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
- The literature review of motion planning is quite substandard. Authors are strongly encouraged to discuss the comparison against reactive local planning methods with collision avoidance such as velocity obstacles and safety barrier certificates. - While the idea of using diffusion model is interesting, the paper fails to justify how the introduction of diffusion model could overcome local minima issues suffered from traditional potential field based approaches. In fact, all the static obstacl
See above.
See above.
1. The paper is overall easy to understand. 2. The experiment looks promising.
1. Typos. 1a. Page 6, in the caption of Figure 4, there should be a space before '(b)'. And this caption text is not finished. 1b. Page 6, at the end of this page, 'spasrse' should be 'sparse'. 2. Though the compositionality seems to work well, the theoretical side is unclear. See question 2. 3. Some settings of the experiments need to be further clarified to evaluate the paper better. See question 3.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics · Robotic Path Planning Algorithms · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
