Understanding and Addressing Gender Bias in Expert Finding Task
Maddalena Amendola, Carlos Castillo, Andrea Passarella, Raffaele, Perego

TL;DR
This paper investigates gender bias in expert finding models on StackOverflow, revealing biases favoring male users and proposing methods to improve gender fairness without losing accuracy.
Contribution
It is the first study to detect and mitigate gender bias in expert finding models, introducing balanced preprocessing and content/social network integration.
Findings
Models favor male users due to activity and reputation biases.
Proposed adjustments improve gender balance significantly.
Fairer models maintain comparable accuracy.
Abstract
The Expert Finding (EF) task is critical in community Question&Answer (CQ&A) platforms, significantly enhancing user engagement by improving answer quality and reducing response times. However, biases, especially gender biases, have been identified in these platforms. This study investigates gender bias in state-of-the-art EF models and explores methods to mitigate it. Utilizing a comprehensive dataset from StackOverflow, the largest community in the StackExchange network, we conduct extensive experiments to analyze how EF models' candidate identification processes influence gender representation. Our findings reveal that models relying on reputation metrics and activity levels disproportionately favor male users, who are more active on the platform. This bias results in the underrepresentation of female experts in the ranking process. We propose adjustments to EF models that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGender Diversity and Inequality
MethodsFocus
