Dust in Little Red Dots

TL;DR

JWST observations of 'little red dots' at high redshift reveal they are compact, dust-rich objects with specific dust properties, but they contribute minimally to the cosmic dust budget due to their low dust masses.

Contribution

This study provides the first average dust property constraints for high-redshift LRDs, based on a large literature sample, highlighting their low dust masses and implications for galaxy evolution.

Findings

Average dust mass of LRDs is approximately 1.6×10^4 M_7

Spectral energy distributions peak around 100 K regardless of heating source

LRDs' low dust masses imply they contribute negligibly to cosmic dust budget

Abstract

JWST has revealed a ubiquitous population of ``little red dots'' (LRDs) at $z\gtrsim4$, selected via their red rest-frame optical emission and compact morphologies. They are thought to be reddened by dust, whether in tori of active galactic nuclei or the interstellar medium (ISM), though none have direct dust detections to date. Informed by the average characteristics of 675 LRDs drawn from the literature, we provide ballpark constraints on the dust characteristics of the LRD population and estimate they have average dust masses of $\langle M_{\rm dust}\rangle=(1.6^{+4.8}_{-0.9})\times10^{4} M_\odot$, luminosities of $\langle L_{\rm IR}\rangle=(8^{+3}_{-5})\times10^{10} L_\odot$ and temperatures of $\langle T_{\rm dust}\rangle=110^{+21}_{-36}$ K. Notably, the spectral energy distributions are thought to peak at $\sim$100 K (rest-frame 20-30 $\mu$m) regardless of heating mechanism, whether AGN or star formation. LRDs' compact sizes $R_{\rm eff}\sim100$ pc are the dominant factor contributing to their low estimated dust masses. Our predictions likely mean LRDs have, on average, submillimeter emission a factor of $\sim$100$\times$ fainter than current ALMA limits provide. The star-to-dust ratio is a factor $\sim$100$\times$ larger than expected from dust formation models if one assumes the rest-optical light is dominated by stars; this suggests stars do not dominate. Despite their high apparent volume density, LRDs contribute negligibly (0.1%) to the cosmic dust budget at $z\gtrsim4$ due to their low dust masses.