Freeze-in as a Complementary Process to Freeze-Out
Rodrigo Capucha, Karim Elyaouti, Margarete M\"uhlleitner, Johann, Plotnikov, Rui Santos

TL;DR
This paper explores how combining freeze-in and freeze-out mechanisms in dark matter models can reconcile relic density measurements and explain detection challenges, proposing a multi-component dark matter scenario involving FIMPs.
Contribution
It introduces a model extension that incorporates freeze-in dark matter to complement freeze-out, addressing relic density issues and detection limitations.
Findings
Freeze-in can complement freeze-out to match relic density.
Multi-component DM models may evade direct and indirect detection.
Collider signatures could indicate FIMP presence.
Abstract
There are many extensions of the Standard Model with a dark matter (DM) candidate obtained via the freeze-out mechanism. It can happen that after all experimental and theoretical constraints are taken into account, all parameter points have a relic density below the experimentally measured value. This means that the models solve only partially the DM problem, and at least one more candidate is needed. In this work we show that it is possible to further extend the model with a DM candidate obtained via the freeze-in mechanism to be in agreement with the relic density experimental measurement. Once the relic density problem is solved with this addition, new questions are raised. This new model with at least two DM candidates could have a freeze-out undetectable DM particle both in direct and indirect detection. This could happen if the freeze-out DM particle would have a very low density.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFreezing and Crystallization Processes
