Fair Submodular Cover
Wenjing Chen, Shuo Xing, Samson Zhou, Victoria G. Crawford

TL;DR
This paper introduces the Fair Submodular Cover problem, proposing new algorithms that balance coverage and fairness in subset selection, with theoretical guarantees and empirical validation on maximum coverage tasks.
Contribution
The paper formulates the Fair Submodular Cover problem and develops discrete and continuous algorithms with strong approximation guarantees, advancing fair optimization methods.
Findings
Discrete algorithms achieve a bicriteria approximation of (1/ε, 1-O(ε)).
Continuous algorithm matches the best approximation guarantee of unconstrained submodular cover.
Empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms on maximum coverage instances.
Abstract
Submodular optimization is a fundamental problem with many applications in machine learning, often involving decision-making over datasets with sensitive attributes such as gender or age. In such settings, it is often desirable to produce a diverse solution set that is fairly distributed with respect to these attributes. Motivated by this, we initiate the study of Fair Submodular Cover (FSC), where given a ground set , a monotone submodular function , a threshold , the goal is to find a balanced subset of with minimum cardinality such that . We first introduce discrete algorithms for FSC that achieve a bicriteria approximation ratio of . We then present a continuous algorithm that achieves a -bicriteria approximation ratio, which matches the best…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
The authors present the first known algorithm for fair submodular cover, which achieves a near-optimal approximation ratio close to that of the greedy algorithm for the non-fair version, with the added benefit of increased diversity in the selected elements. Also, the paper includes experimental results that support the practical effectiveness of their proposed methods and highlight the benefits of their approach in selecting diverse elements across classes.
The difference between the authors' reduction and the existing reduction from general submodular maximization to submodular cover could be elaborated on further. This distinction is somewhat unclear, and understanding the technical differences would enhance the clarity of their contribution. The paper could benefit from a more detailed comparison between their fair submodular maximization algorithms and existing algorithms for submodular maximization under matroid constraints, especially for th
- The fair submodular cover problem makes sense. The paper makes theoretical contributions. A nice relationship between FSM and FSC is established in the paper and several bicriteria approximation algorithms are proposed. The high-level algorithmic ideas are clean. - Both theoretical analysts and empirical evaluations are provided.
- The problem certainly holds theoretical interest. However, I am a bit concerned about whether it will engage the ICLR community. Could the authors provide some real-world applications? - The authors did not compare the empirical running time of the proposed algorithms with the baselines. The theoretical running time looks horrible, so I wonder how long these algorithms will take in practice.
1. The studied problem is theoretically interesting and the presentation of this paper is clear. I appreciate that the authors give an intuitive description, which helps understand the algorithm's high-level idea. 2. The obtained results are almost tight for a bicriteria approximation. Based on my knowledge, these kinds of fairness constraints (upper and lower bounds for each group) always improve the difficulty of a problem a lot. It is reasonable to study the bicriteria approximation in this
1. The studied problem is theoretically interesting, but it is a little incremental. One needs to provide convincing motivation for the problem. It looks that the studied problem only adds an extra constraint to the classical submodular cover problem. The introduction section does not give a specific motivation for the studied problem. 2. There is no lower bound known in the paper. Namely, there is no lower bound for the bicriteria approximation. This may not be a big problem since these fair c
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsEuropean and International Contract Law
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
