Relational objectivity in presence of finite quantum resources
Luis C. Barbado, \v{C}aslav Brukner

TL;DR
This paper explores a relational approach to quantum systems that accounts for finite resources, challenging traditional infinite-resource assumptions and aiming to formalize a more realistic quantum description.
Contribution
It introduces a finite-resource, relational formalism inspired by Penrose's spin networks, moving beyond textbook quantum mechanics assumptions.
Findings
Highlights limitations of infinite-resource assumptions in quantum descriptions
Proposes a finite-resource relational framework based on spin networks
Addresses conceptual issues in quantum system and context inseparability
Abstract
The no-go theorems of Bell and Kochen and Specker could be interpreted as implying that the notions of system and experimental context are fundamentally inseparable. In this interpretation, statements such as "spin is 'up' along direction " are relational statements about the configurations of macroscopic devices which are mediated by the spin and not about any intrinsic properties of the spin. The operational meaning of these statements is provided by the practically infinite resources of macroscopic devices that serve to define the notion of a direction in three-dimensional space. This is the subject of "textbook quantum mechanics": The description of quantum systems in relation to an experimental context. Can one go beyond that? Relational quantum mechanics endeavors to provide a relational description between any quantum systems without the necessity of involving macroscopic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Information and Cryptography
