HuntFUZZ: Enhancing Error Handling Testing through Clustering Based Fuzzing

TL;DR

HuntFUZZ introduces a clustering-based approach to error handling fuzzing, reducing redundancy and improving bug detection efficiency by targeting correlated error points with minimal repeated testing.

Contribution

It presents a novel SFI-based fuzzing framework that clusters correlated error points and uses concolic execution to optimize testing, outperforming existing fuzzers in bug detection.

Findings

Successfully revealed 162 known bugs, including 62 error handling bugs.

Discovered 7 new zero-day bugs missed by other fuzzers.

Achieved broader error point coverage and faster bug detection.

Abstract

Testing a program's capability to effectively handling errors is a significant challenge, given that program errors are relatively uncommon. To solve this, Software Fault Injection (SFI)-based fuzzing integrates SFI and traditional fuzzing, injecting and triggering errors for testing (error handling) code. However, we observe that current SFI-based fuzzing approaches have overlooked the correlation between paths housing error points. In fact, the execution paths of error points often share common paths. Nonetheless, Fuzzers usually generate test cases repeatedly to test error points on commonly traversed paths. This practice can compromise the efficiency of the fuzzer(s). Thus, this paper introduces HuntFUZZ, a novel SFI-based fuzzing framework that addresses the issue of redundant testing of error points with correlated paths. Specifically, HuntFUZZ clusters these correlated error points and utilizes concolic execution to compute constraints only for common paths within each cluster. By doing so, we provide the fuzzer with efficient test cases to explore related error points with minimal redundancy. We evaluate HuntFUZZ on a diverse set of 42 applications, and HuntFUZZ successfully reveals 162 known bugs, with 62 of them being related to error handling. Additionally, due to its efficient error point detection method, HuntFUZZ discovers 7 unique zero-day bugs, which are all missed by existing fuzzers. Furthermore, we compare HuntFUZZ with 4 existing fuzzing approaches, including AFL, AFL++, AFLGo, and EH-FUZZ. Our evaluation confirms that HuntFUZZ can cover a broader range of error points, and it exhibits better performance in terms of bug finding speed.