The Gaia-ESO Survey DR5.1 and Gaia DR3 GSP-Spec: a comparative analysis

TL;DR

This study compares Gaia-ESO DR5.1 and Gaia DR3 GSP-Spec data, assessing their agreement in stellar parameters, abundances, and velocities, and explores implications for Galactic structure and stellar populations.

Contribution

It provides a detailed comparison between Gaia-ESO DR5.1 and Gaia DR3 GSP-Spec datasets, highlighting their agreement and limitations for stellar parameter and abundance determinations.

Findings

Excellent agreement in radial velocities between datasets.

GSP-Spec gravity calibration is preferred over uncalibrated values.

Parameter quality degrades for objects fainter than G~11.

Abstract

(abridged) The third data release of Gaia, has provided stellar parameters, metallicity [M/H], [{\alpha}/Fe], individual abundances, broadening parameter from its RVS spectra for about 5.6 million objects thanks to the GSP-Spec module. The catalogue publishes the radial velocity of 33 million sources. We took advantage of the intersections between Gaia RVS and Gaia-ESO to compare their stellar parameters, abundances and radial and rotational velocities. We aimed at verifying the overall agreement between the two datasets, considering the various calibrations and the quality-control flag system suggested for the Gaia GSP-Spec parameters. For the targets in common between Gaia RVS and Gaia-ESO, we performed several statistical checks on the distributions of their stellar parameters, abundances and velocities of targets in common. For the Gaia surface gravity and metallicity we considered both the uncalibrated and calibrated values. We find an excellent agreement between the Gaia and Gaia-ESO radial velocities given the uncertainties affecting each dataset. Less than 25 of ~2100 Gaia-ESO spectroscopic binaries are flagged as non-single stars by Gaia. The temperature scales are in good agreement. The calibrated GSP-Spec gravity should be preferred. We note that the quality (accuracy, precision) of the GSP-Spec parameters degrades quickly for objects fainter than G~11. We find that the somewhat imprecise GSP-Spec abundances due to its medium-resolution spectroscopy over a short wavelength window and the faint G regime of the sample under study can be counterbalanced by working with averaged quantities. We studied some properties of the open-cluster population: our combined sample traces very well the radial [Fe/H] and [Ca/Fe] gradients, the age-metallicity relations in different radial regions, and it places the clusters in the thin disc.