Continuous-time quantum optimisation without the adiabatic principle
Robert J. Banks, Georgios S. Raftis, Dan E. Browne, P. A. Warburton

TL;DR
This paper proposes a new physical motivation for continuous-time quantum optimization algorithms based on Planck's principle, leading to monotonic schedules that differ from traditional adiabatic approaches and revealing limitations of reverse annealing.
Contribution
It introduces Planck's principle as the foundation for continuous-time quantum algorithms, moving beyond the adiabatic principle and providing new insights into quantum annealing schedules.
Findings
Monotonic schedules justified by Planck's principle.
Limitations of reverse quantum annealing in isolated systems.
New physical motivation for non-adiabatic quantum algorithms.
Abstract
Continuous-time quantum algorithms for combinatorial optimisation problems, such as quantum annealing, have previously been motivated by the adiabatic principle. A number of continuous-time approaches exploit dynamics, however, and therefore are no longer physically motivated by the adiabatic principle. In this work, we take Planck's principle as the underlying physical motivation for continuous-time quantum algorithms. Planck's principle states that the energy of an isolated system cannot decrease as the result of a cyclic process. We use this principle to justify monotonic schedules in quantum annealing, which are not adiabatic. This approach also highlights the limitations of reverse quantum annealing in an isolated system.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
