Asymmetric Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma on BA Scale-Free Network
Yunhao Ding, Chunyan Zhang, Jianlei Zhang

TL;DR
This paper investigates how asymmetric strategies evolve in a weighted BA scale-free network during repeated Prisoner's Dilemma games, revealing key strategies and increased cooperation levels.
Contribution
It introduces an analysis of memory-one strategies in asymmetric Prisoner's Dilemma on scale-free networks, identifying influential strategies and cooperation enhancement.
Findings
Memory-one strategy components significantly affect win rates
Two special strategies emerged during evolution
Cooperation levels increased among individuals
Abstract
In real-world scenarios, individuals often cooperate for mutual benefit. However, differences in wealth can lead to varying outcomes for similar actions. In complex social networks, individuals' choices are also influenced by their neighbors. To explore the evolution of strategies in realistic settings, we conducted repeated asymmetric prisoners dilemma experiments on a weighted BA scale-free network. Our analysis highlighted how the four components of memory-one strategies affect win rates, found two special strategies in the evolutionary process, and increased the cooperation levels among individuals. These findings offer practical insights for addressing real-world problems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Opportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
