Argument Mining in Data Scarce Settings: Cross-lingual Transfer and Few-shot Techniques
Anar Yeginbergen, Maite Oronoz, Rodrigo Agerri

TL;DR
This paper investigates cross-lingual transfer and few-shot techniques for Argument Mining, revealing that data transfer and fine-tuning outperform previous assumptions about model-transfer and prompting in this complex sequence labelling task.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence that challenges prior beliefs, showing data transfer and fine-tuning are more effective than model-transfer and prompting for Argument Mining.
Findings
Data transfer outperforms model-transfer in Argument Mining.
Fine-tuning surpasses few-shot prompting methods.
Domain and task complexity influence transfer effectiveness.
Abstract
Recent research on sequence labelling has been exploring different strategies to mitigate the lack of manually annotated data for the large majority of the world languages. Among others, the most successful approaches have been based on (i) the cross-lingual transfer capabilities of multilingual pre-trained language models (model-transfer), (ii) data translation and label projection (data-transfer) and (iii), prompt-based learning by reusing the mask objective to exploit the few-shot capabilities of pre-trained language models (few-shot). Previous work seems to conclude that model-transfer outperforms data-transfer methods and that few-shot techniques based on prompting are superior to updating the model's weights via fine-tuning. In this paper, we empirically demonstrate that, for Argument Mining, a sequence labelling task which requires the detection of long and complex discourse…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Software Engineering Research · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
