SemioLLM: Evaluating Large Language Models for Diagnostic Reasoning from Unstructured Clinical Narratives in Epilepsy
Meghal Dani, Muthu Jeyanthi Prakash, Filip Rosa, Zeynep Akata, Stefanie Liebe

TL;DR
This study evaluates the diagnostic reasoning capabilities of various Large Language Models in interpreting unstructured clinical narratives in epilepsy, highlighting their potential and current limitations in clinical settings.
Contribution
Introduces SemioLLM, a framework for assessing LLMs' performance on unstructured clinical data, revealing insights into their strengths and interpretability challenges in healthcare.
Findings
Models often match ground truth and approach clinician-level performance.
Chain-of-thought prompting improves model reasoning.
Performance varies significantly with narrative length and language context.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to encode clinical knowledge. Many evaluations, however, rely on structured question-answer benchmarks, overlooking critical challenges of interpreting and reasoning about unstructured clinical narratives in real-world settings. In this study we task eight Large Language models including two medical models (GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Mixtral-8x7B, Qwen-72B, LlaMa2, LlaMa3, OpenBioLLM, Med42) with a core diagnostic task in epilepsy: mapping seizure description phrases, after targeted filtering and standardization, to one of seven possible seizure onset zones using likelihood estimates. Most models yield results that often match the ground truth and even approach clinician-level performance after prompt engineering. Specifically, clinician-guided chain-of-thought reasoning leading to the most consistent improvements. Performance was further strongly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
