What Should Be Considered to Support well-being with AI: Considerations Based on Responsible Research and Innovation
Yuri Nakao

TL;DR
This paper discusses how AI systems can support individual well-being while respecting user autonomy, emphasizing responsible innovation principles like inclusion, anticipation, reflexivity, and responsiveness.
Contribution
It identifies key considerations for designing AI applications that balance promoting well-being with respecting human autonomy, based on responsible research and innovation.
Findings
Highlights the dilemma between general well-being and user autonomy.
Proposes a framework using four dimensions for responsible AI development.
Analyzes an example of a running app to illustrate considerations.
Abstract
To achieve people's well-being with AI systems, we should enable each user to be guided to a healthier lifestyle in a way that is appropriate for her or him. However, there is a dilemma between general well-being as defined in academic and medical discussions and the autonomy users should have when deciding how to promote their well-being. In this position paper, we discuss the difficulty for AI application developers to fully consider in the design phase what might happen to the user, taking an example of a running application (app). We sort out the required factors to enable AI apps that support well-being to address the dilemma between unilaterally defined well-being and human autonomy based on the four dimensions required for responsible innovation: inclusion, anticipation, reflexivity, and responsiveness.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMental Health Research Topics · Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging · COVID-19 and Mental Health
