Generative Large Language Models in Automated Fact-Checking: A Survey
Ivan Vykopal, Mat\'u\v{s} Pikuliak, Simon Ostermann, Mari\'an, \v{S}imko

TL;DR
This survey reviews how generative large language models can support automated fact-checking by examining current methods, challenges, and potential for integration into fact-checking workflows.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of approaches and limitations of using generative LLMs in fact-checking, guiding future research and application.
Findings
Various prompting and fine-tuning techniques are explored.
Current methods have limitations in accuracy and reliability.
Potential for LLMs to augment manual fact-checking processes.
Abstract
The dissemination of false information on online platforms presents a serious societal challenge. While manual fact-checking remains crucial, Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising opportunities to support fact-checkers with their vast knowledge and advanced reasoning capabilities. This survey explores the application of generative LLMs in fact-checking, highlighting various approaches and techniques for prompting or fine-tuning these models. By providing an overview of existing methods and their limitations, the survey aims to enhance the understanding of how LLMs can be used in fact-checking and to facilitate further progress in their integration into the fact-checking process.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Software Engineering Research
