Disentangling individual-level from location-based income uncovers socioeconomic preferential mobility and impacts segregation estimates

TL;DR

This study analyzes how individual income and demographics influence mobility patterns and segregation, revealing preferential behaviors and modeling limitations, with implications for improving mobility models and understanding societal segregation.

Contribution

It introduces a novel approach combining individual-level income data with mobility patterns, uncovering preferential mobility behaviors and highlighting limitations of current models.

Findings

Income groups prefer visiting higher-income areas

Weekends show higher socioeconomic segregation in mobility

Current mobility models poorly capture preferential mobility behaviors

Abstract

Segregation encodes information about society, such as social cohesion, mixing, and inequality. However, most past and current studies tackled socioeconomic (SE) segregation by analyzing static aggregated mobility networks, often without considering further individual features beyond income and, most importantly, without distinguishing individual-level from location-based income. Accessing individual-level income may help mapping macroscopic behavior into more granular mobility patterns, hence impacting segregation estimates. Here we combine a mobile phone dataset of daily mobility flows across Spanish districts stratified and adjusted by age, gender and income with census data of districts median income. We build mobility-based SE assortativity matrices for multiple demographics and observe mobility patterns of three income groups with respect to location-based SE classes. We find that SE assortativity differs when isolating the mobility of specific income groups: we observe that groups prefer to visit areas with higher average income than their own, which we call preferential mobility. Our analysis suggests substantial differences between weekdays and weekends SE assortativity by age class, with weekends characterized by higher SE assortativity. Our modeling approach shows that the radiation model, which typically performs best at reproducing inter-municipal population mobility, best fits middle income and middle-aged flows, while performing worse on young and low income groups. Our double-sided approach, focusing on assortativity patterns and mobility modeling, suggests that state of the art mobility models fail at capturing preferential mobility behavior. Overall, our work indicates that mobility models considering the interplay of SE preferential behavior, age and gender gaps may sensibly improve the state of the art models performance.