Three Myths in Complexity Science and How to Resolve Them
Casper van Elteren

TL;DR
This paper debunks three myths in complexity science, clarifies essential definitions, and offers a contemporary interpretation to advance understanding of complex systems.
Contribution
It provides a new interpretation of complex systems and clarifies key definitions, addressing misconceptions in the field.
Findings
Debunking of three common myths in complexity science
Proposed resolutions for misconceptions in complex systems
A contemporary framework for understanding complex systems
Abstract
From bird flocking to neural dynamics, complex systems generate fascinating structures and correlations. Often, seemingly simple dynamics lead to intricate emergent properties. Despite their visceral appeal, defining complex systems lacks universal agreement. In this paper, I will debunk three prevalent myths in complex systems and propose resolutions. This work contributes by offering a contemporary interpretation of complex systems, presenting essential definitions that benefit complexity scientists.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Systems and Decision Making · Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence
