A note on words having the same image on finite groups
Shrinit Singh

TL;DR
This paper investigates when words in free groups are uniquely determined by their images on finite groups, introducing weak profinite rigidity and establishing rigidity results for powers of primitive and surface words.
Contribution
It introduces weak profinite rigidity for words and proves that powers of primitive and surface words are weakly profinitely rigid, linking rigidity to probability measures on finite groups.
Findings
Powers of primitive words are weakly profinitely rigid.
Words with identical images induce the same probability measure on finite groups.
Weak profinite rigidity is equivalent to profinite rigidity for test words.
Abstract
In this work, we explore the following question: If two words in a finitely generated free group have identical images as word maps on every finite group, must they be endomorphic to each other? In this regard, we introduce weak profinite rigidity for words, a parallel to profinite rigidity, as defined in \cite{hanany2020some}. We establish that the powers of primitive words in any finitely generated free group are weakly profinitely rigid. Furthermore, if a word in has the same image on every finite group as a test word in , then both words induce the same probability measure on every finite group. We also prove that a test word in is weakly profinitely rigid if and only if it is profinitely rigid. As a consequence, we establish that the powers of surface words, i.e., in and in , for $n…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Finite Group Theory Research · Coding theory and cryptography
