CSPBench: a benchmark and critical evaluation of Crystal Structure Prediction

TL;DR

This paper introduces a comprehensive benchmark suite and evaluation framework for crystal structure prediction (CSP), revealing current algorithms' limitations and highlighting the potential of machine learning-based methods.

Contribution

It provides the first standardized benchmark dataset, performance metrics, and a comparative analysis of 13 state-of-the-art CSP algorithms.

Findings

Most algorithms struggle with correct space group identification.

Template-based algorithms perform better on similar templates.

ML potential-based algorithms show competitive performance.

Abstract

Crystal structure prediction (CSP) is now increasingly used in discovering novel materials with applications in diverse industries. However, despite decades of developments and significant progress in this area, there lacks a set of well-defined benchmark dataset, quantitative performance metrics, and studies that evaluate the status of the field. We aim to fill this gap by introducing a CSP benchmark suite with 180 test structures along with our recently implemented CSP performance metric set. We benchmark a collection of 13 state-of-the-art (SOTA) CSP algorithms including template-based CSP algorithms, conventional CSP algorithms based on DFT calculations and global search such as CALYPSO, CSP algorithms based on machine learning (ML) potentials and global search, and distance matrix based CSP algorithms. Our results demonstrate that the performance of the current CSP algorithms is far from being satisfactory. Most algorithms cannot even identify the structures with the correct space groups except for the template-based algorithms when applied to test structures with similar templates. We also find that the ML potential based CSP algorithms are now able to achieve competitive performances compared to the DFT-based algorithms. These CSP algorithms' performance is strongly determined by the quality of the neural potentials as well as the global optimization algorithms. Our benchmark suite comes with a comprehensive open-source codebase and 180 well-selected benchmark crystal structures, making it convenient to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of CSP algorithms from future studies. All the code and benchmark data are available at https://github.com/usccolumbia/cspbenchmark