Unusual Pore Volume Dependence of Water Sorption in Monolithic Metal-Organic Framework
Jiawang Li, Guang Wang, Hongzhao Fan, Zhigang Li, Chi Yan Tso and, Yanguang Zhou

TL;DR
This study reveals that monolithic MOF-801 has larger pore volume but lower water uptake at moderate humidity compared to powder form, due to capillary condensation effects, informing future MOF-based water harvesting systems.
Contribution
It provides a systematic investigation of water sorption in monolithic versus powder MOF-801, highlighting the impact of pore structure on water adsorption behavior.
Findings
Monolithic MOF-801 has larger pore volume and mesopores than powder MOF-801.
Water uptake in monolithic MOF-801 is lower than powder at 10-90% RH.
Capillary condensation in mesopores explains the water adsorption behavior.
Abstract
Monolithic metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), which have a continuous structure composed of small primary MOF particles and amorphous networks, are demonstrated to possess larger pore volume and thus better larger gas uptake capacity compared to their powder forms. Here, we systematically investigated the water vapor adsorption kinetics in a prototypical MOF, i.e., MOF-801. Our results show that the total pore volume (average pore diameter) of the monolithic MOF-801 is 0.831 cm3/g (5.20 nm) which is much larger than that of powder MOF-801, i.e., 0.488 cm3/g (1.95 nm). Unexpectedly, we find that the water uptake capacity of monolithic MOF-801 is much lower than that of powder MOF-801 when the RH ranges from 10% to 90%. Our molecular dynamics simulations further demonstrate that the unexpected water uptake capacity of monolithic MOF-801 at RH of 10%~90% is caused by the water film formed by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Machine Learning and ELM
