Is It Really Long Context if All You Need Is Retrieval? Towards Genuinely Difficult Long Context NLP
Omer Goldman, Alon Jacovi, Aviv Slobodkin, Aviya Maimon, Ido Dagan, Reut Tsarfaty

TL;DR
This paper argues that long-context NLP tasks are diverse and should be categorized by difficulty properties like information diffusion and scope, to improve research focus and benchmark design.
Contribution
It introduces a taxonomy of long-context tasks based on difficulty axes and advocates for more precise task definitions and benchmarks.
Findings
Long-context tasks vary significantly in difficulty.
A taxonomy based on diffusion and scope clarifies task complexity.
Under-explored areas involve highly diffused, lengthy necessary information.
Abstract
Improvements in language models' capabilities have pushed their applications towards longer contexts, making long-context evaluation and development an active research area. However, many disparate use-cases are grouped together under the umbrella term of "long-context", defined simply by the total length of the model's input, including - for example - Needle-in-a-Haystack tasks, book summarization, and information aggregation. Given their varied difficulty, in this position paper we argue that conflating different tasks by their context length is unproductive. As a community, we require a more precise vocabulary to understand what makes long-context tasks similar or different. We propose to unpack the taxonomy of long-context based on the properties that make them more difficult with longer contexts. We propose two orthogonal axes of difficulty: (I) Diffusion: How hard is it to find…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Semantic Web and Ontologies
